---

Control cables rarely fail in CAD.

They fail in the real world, where routing gets tight, brackets flex, contamination shows up, temperatures swing, and small sources of variation stack up across parts and builds.

This guide is written for design engineers and sourcing teams who want a control cable assembly that performs predictably on the machine, on the line, and in the field.

What “good performance” means

When you spec a mechanical motion control cable system, “good” should mean:

• Consistent feel: smooth operation without sticking, surging, or “notchy” behavior
• Predictable output travel: the output moves the right amount for a given input, every time
• Acceptable operator effort: force stays within limits across the full stroke and temperature range
• Durability over cycles and exposure: performance holds after vibration, contamination, corrosion, and repeated use

If your drawing only calls out length and end fittings, you have not specified performance. You have specified geometry.

---

Quick definitions

Lost motion: input movement that does not produce output movement (dead band).
Backlash: clearance or play that shows up when reversing direction.
Efficiency: how much input force becomes useful output, instead of friction losses.
Minimum bend radius: tightest allowable bend that still maintains performance and service life.

These are the levers that determine whether a cable “feels right” and holds calibration.

---

Step 1: Start with the system requirements, not the part number

A control cable system includes the input lever, cable assembly, brackets, clamps, routing path, and the output mechanism. If one element is weak, the cable gets blamed anyway.

Before selecting a cable type, lock down four requirement groups.

Function and loads

• Push, pull, or push-pull
• Peak vs continuous load
• Shock loads or slam events
• Side loads caused by misalignment

Travel and accuracy

• Required stroke at the output
• Allowable lost motion and backlash
• Repeatability requirement (what variation is acceptable unit-to-unit?)

Environment

• Temperature range and heat soak locations
• Dirt, grit, mud, washdown, chemical exposure
• Water ingress and corrosion risk (salt, humidity)
• Vibration and mounting stiffness

Packaging and service

• Routing constraints and available clamp locations
• Service access and replacement method
• Assembly process sensitivity (how easy is it to route “wrong” on the line?)

---

Step 2: Design around the real-world failure modes

Most control cable performance issues fall into four buckets. A good control cable specification prevents each one.

1) Routing-driven friction and high effort

Common causes:

• Too many bends, tight radii, or bends in multiple planes
• Poor support strategy that allows rub, whip, or chafe
• Side loading at conduit exits due to misalignment

What it looks like:

• High effort, inconsistent feel, stick-slip, worsening over time

2) Lost motion and backlash in the assembly and interfaces

Common causes:

• Conduit compression under load
• Bracket deflection
• Clearance at end fittings and attachment points
• Tolerance stack across mounts and linkages

What it looks like:

• Dead band, output lag, inconsistent end position, difficult calibration

3) Environmental degradation

Common causes:

• Contamination ingress and abrasion
• Corrosion at fittings and interfaces
• Temperature effects on liners, lubricants, and material stiffness

What it looks like:

• Effort drift, roughness, accelerated wear, early failures

4) Variation across builds

Common causes:

• Clamp placement differences and routing slack
• Assembly method differences
• Substituted materials or “equivalents” without controls

What it looks like:

• Some units pass, others fail, inconsistent line results

---

Step 3: Select the right cable architecture for your performance target

Cable selection is not one-size-fits-all. The right choice depends on precision needs, routing complexity, environment, and duty cycle.

Sliding control cable assemblies

Best fit when:

• Accuracy requirements are moderate
• The environment is harsh and durability is the priority
• The design can support good routing practices and generous bend radii

Where teams get burned:

• Expecting precision feel without controlling routing, alignment, and bracket stiffness

Low lost motion / low backlash architectures (including bearing-based designs)

Best fit when:

• Output repeatability matters
• Operator feel is a primary requirement
• You need stable performance across temperature and duty cycle
• You cannot tolerate meaningful dead band during reversals

Important note:
A “higher precision” cable cannot fix a weak system. If brackets flex or routing is abusive, performance still degrades.

Cablecraft approach: We treat cable selection as an engineered system decision. Our engineering team supports design review, prototyping, and validation so you can lock performance early and avoid late-stage surprises.

---

Step 4: Specify conduit and innermember as a performance pair

Two assemblies can look identical on a print and behave very differently in the field. A major reason is how the conduit and innermember are matched for:

• Friction and efficiency (operator effort and smoothness)
• Backlash and lost motion (stiffness and compression under load)
• Abrasion and contamination resistance (grit, mud, washdown)
• Temperature behavior (cold stiffness, heat soak durability)
• Bend radius capability (routing resilience without performance collapse)

If your spec only lists “cable assembly,” you are leaving the most important performance drivers unspecified.

---

Step 5: Put routing requirements into the drawing package

Routing is where control cables fail most often. Treat routing guidance like a requirement, not tribal knowledge.

Minimum bend radius

• Define a minimum bend radius and enforce it
• Call out examples of acceptable routing patterns

Limit cumulative bends

• Total bends matter, not only the tightest bend
• Every bend increases friction and sensitivity to variation

Prevent side loading at conduit exits

• Keep alignment straight at the cable end
• Avoid forcing the cable to correct angular misalignment

Support and clamp strategy

• Define clamp spacing and clamp type
• Protect against chafe points, debris impact, and vibration

Serviceability

• Validate that replacement does not force tighter routing
• Ensure the service procedure preserves routing intent

---

Step 6: Don’t ignore brackets and interfaces

Many “cable problems” are bracket problems.

Bracket stiffness

If a bracket deflects under load, you add lost motion and inconsistency.

What to do:

• Specify allowable bracket deflection under load
• Validate with an early load test
• Stiffen only where it impacts performance

Interface play and alignment

Loose interfaces create backlash during reversals.

What to do:

• Specify allowable play at attachment points
• Specify alignment tolerance at the mounting points
• Prevent the cable from carrying unintended side loads

---

Step 7: Make your spec measurable with acceptance criteria

A real-world spec defines performance, test method, and boundary conditions.

Effort and feel

• Input force range across the stroke
• Maximum peak force and where it occurs
• Temperature conditions (cold start vs steady state)

Lost motion and backlash

• Maximum allowable lost motion at the output
• Test load and measurement method
• Reversal behavior requirements

Durability

• Cycle life under representative loads
• Environmental exposure requirements (temperature cycling, contamination, corrosion)
• Post-test limits (allowable drift in effort and lost motion)

Variation control

• Incoming inspection or final test criteria
• Defined limits for substitutions and “equivalents”
• Change control expectations and documentation

Cablecraft messaging point: This is where an engineered supplier matters. We support customers with disciplined quality systems and engineering-driven validation so performance is designed in and maintained across production.